Skip to main content

Proposed 'under care' guidance

 

  1. We propose that the current guidance on ‘under care’ be removed and replaced with the following.

     

Prescribing POM-Vs

  1. According to the Veterinary Medicines Regulations 2013 (VMRs), to prescribe prescription-only veterinary medicines (POM-Vs), a veterinary surgeon must carry out a clinical assessment of the animal and the animal must be under their care. The terms ‘clinical assessment’ and ‘under…care’ are not defined by the VMRs, however the RCVS has interpreted them in the following way.
     
  2. An animal is under a veterinary surgeon’s care when the veterinary surgeon is given, and accepts, responsibility for the health of an animal (or a herd, flock or group of animals) whether generally, or by undertaking a specific procedure or test, or prescribing a course of treatment. Responsibility for an animal may be given by the owner/client, statute or other authority.
     
  3. A clinical assessment is any assessment which provides the veterinary surgeon with enough information to diagnose and prescribe safely and effectively. A clinical assessment may include a physical examination, however, this may not be necessary in every case.
     
  4. Whether or not a physical examination is necessary is a matter for the veterinary surgeon’s judgement. The following factors are relevant in this respect, however veterinary surgeons should note this list is not exhaustive:
    1. The health condition, or potential health conditions, being treated and any associated risks (see further guidance below at paragraph 5 and 6)
    2. The nature of the medication being prescribed, including any possible side effects (see further guidance below at paragraphs 7 and 8)
    3. When the animal (or premises in the case of agricultural animals) was last physically examined by a veterinary surgeon
    4. Whether there is access to the animal’s previous clinical history
    5. The experience and reliability of the animal owner
    6. Whether the animal is known to the veterinary surgeon and/or whether there is an existing relationship with the client or animal owner
    7. The practicality of a physical examination for individual animals, particularly when dealing with herds, flocks or groups of animals
    8. The health status of the herd, flock or group of animals
    9. The overall state of the animal’s health
    10. The impact of any prescription made without physical examination on the ability to gather subsequent diagnostic information
       
  5. The more complex or unusual the health needs of the animal, or where a differential diagnosis includes serious conditions not yet ruled out, the more likely a physical examination will be necessary.
     
  6. In respect of paragraph 4(a) above, a physical examination is required where a notifiable disease is suspected or part of a differential diagnosis.
     
  7. In respect of paragraph 4(b) above, and given the importance of minimising the development of antimicrobial resistance:
    1. A physical examination is required in all but exceptional circumstances where a veterinary surgeon prescribes antimicrobials for an individual animal or group of animals that are not agricultural animals. Veterinary surgeons should be prepared to justify their decision in cases where antimicrobials are prescribed without a physical examination and record this justification in the clinical notes.
    2. When prescribing antimicrobials for agricultural animals, veterinary surgeons should ensure they have an in-depth knowledge of the premises, including its production systems, the environment, disease challenges and the general health status of the herd or flock. Veterinary surgeons should have attended the premises and physically examined at least one animal immediately prior to prescribing or, where this is not possible, recently enough to ensure they have adequate information and knowledge to prescribe responsibly. Veterinary surgeons should be prepared to justify their decision in cases where antimicrobials are prescribed without conducting a physical examination and record this justification in the clinical notes.

      Note: For more information about responsible prescribing to minimise antimicrobial resistance, please see Chapter 4: Medicines, paragraphs 4.23 and 4.24.

  8. In respect of 4(b) above, when prescribing controlled drugs to an animal in the first instance, veterinary surgeons should carry out a physical examination in all but exceptional circumstances and be prepared to justify their decision where no physical examination has taken place. This justification should be recorded in the clinical notes. It is acceptable to issue a repeat prescription for controlled drugs without a physical examination, however, veterinary surgeons should carry out a further clinical assessment to ensure they have enough information to do so safely and effectively.
     
  9. Where a physical examination is not carried out immediately prior to prescribing POM-Vs, veterinary surgeons should ensure that a 24/7 follow-up service involving physical examination and any other necessary investigation if required is immediately available in the event that the animal does not improve, suffers an adverse reaction or deteriorates. Where a veterinary surgeon is not able to provide this service themselves, they should arrange for another veterinary service provider to do so. This arrangement should be made before veterinary services are offered and confirmed in writing as part of the conditions of service agreed by the client.
     
  10. Veterinary surgeons must maintain clinical records of animals, herds, flocks or other groups of animals under their care.

Continue Reading

The review

Review of 'under care' and 24/7 emergency cover (stage 3): The review

Recommendations regarding 24-hour emergency cover

Review of 'under care' and 24/7 emergency cover (stage 3): Recommendations regarding 24-hour emergency cover